Pages

Monday, September 12, 2011

Maryland legislators warned of cuts to federal transportation funds

Reduced Federal funding may affect Maryland roads
This week, Maryland legislators were warned that upcoming budget negotiations on Capitol Hill could result in less federal transportation funding for roads, highways, and transit projects in the State.  Congress has until September 30, 2011, to reauthorize and extend federal funding for State roads and transit systems.

The Republican-controlled House has proposed a six-year $230-billion extension that would cut current annual spending by 35 percent.  If that becomes a reality, then Maryland would be forced to make painful decisions on its future road and transit projects.  The State may have to delay or cut more than $170 million in projects annually, which would eliminate 1,800 direct and indirect jobs.   

Previously, Maryland officials called for an $800 million increase to the State's transportation budget to maintain aging infrastructure and pay for new road and transit projects.  Unfortunately, any funding could be difficult to obtain since both the Federal and State highway trust funds, which depend on gas taxes, have been depleted in recent years due to the economic downturn that saw fewer motorists driving and many of those motorists switched to more fuel-efficient vehicles.  The State may have to resort to a toll increase to help close any budget shortfalls and ensure ongoing maintenance of the State's toll facilities, including the Intercounty Connector (ICC), which is nearing completion in 2012.  Also under consideration is an increase of the State's gas tax, which currently stands at 23.4 cents per gallon.

If the tolls on the ICC go up, that could spell further disaster for Norbeck Road as drivers using the ICC may simply switch back to local roads, as if there isn't already enough traffic on Norbeck.  Anyone been on Norbeck during morning and evening rush hours?  If so, you'll know what an ordeal it is just to enter/exit Norbeck Road from residential streets.  An impossible task! 

Please contact your Maryland State Senator Roger Manno by telephone at 301-858-3151 and by e-mail at roger.manno@state.senate.md.us to voice your support for safety improvements to Norbeck Road including ample shoulders, sidewalks, and bike paths. 

See full article after the jump:


Legislators warned of likely cuts in federal transit funds

ANNAPOLIS — Maryland legislators were warned Wednesday that upcoming Capitol Hill budget negotiations could result in less federal transportation money, which would force them to offset the losses through state-level cuts, layoffs or tax increases.

That message was delivered Wednesday to the General Assembly's Joint Committee on Federal Relations, whose members were told Maryland could soon be forced to make difficult decisions on how and whether they will fund certain road and transit projects.

Congress has until Sept. 30 to reauthorize and extend its funding for state roads and transit systems, with the Republican-controlled House considering a six-year, $230-billion extension that would cut current annual funding by about 35 percent.

"The road ahead is very unclear - as unclear as I have seen it," said Jack Basso, chief operating officer of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. "Some very critical long-term decisions need to be made by Congress."

Maryland officials have in recent months called for increased state funding to maintain aging infrastructure and pay for new road and transit projects, with a state commission even calling for $800 million in new funds.
The Maryland Transportation Authority is also considering increasing tolls to help fund maintenance of its toll facilities.

Additional funding could prove difficult to obtain as the federal and the Maryland highway trust funds - which depend heavily upon gas taxes and user fees - have been depleted in recent years because motorists have been driving less and using more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Congress is unlikely to raise the 18.4-cents-a-gallon federal gas tax, considering that the House GOP recently refused to make tax increases part of a plan to raise the federal debt ceiling. Meanwhile, some Maryland officials are considering raising the state's 23.5-cents-per-gallon rate.

Mr. Basso said federal legislators could consider other revenue generators, such as public-private partnerships, expanded toll systems or increasing funds taken from general funds. However, painful cuts are likely to come that could force states to delay or cancel projects and eliminate jobs associated with such projects.

Caitlin Hughes Rayman, assistant secretary of transportation policy for the Maryland Department of Transportation, warned that a 33 percent cut in federal funding could force the state to delay or cut more than $170 million in projects each year - eliminating 1,800 direct and indirect jobs.

She also said that if Congress fails to approve an extension by Sept. 30, it could cost the state as much as $65 million a month until an agreement is reached.

If Congress reduces its funding, some of the sharpest cuts could come to the Federal Transit Administration's New Starts program, which matches local funding for many major projects, including the Maryland Transit Administration's proposed Baltimore-area Red Line rail route and Purple Line rail route from Bethesda to New Carrollton.

"This is not business as usual," Miss Rayman said.
She also said the circumstances surrounding the future of transportation funding seem to change or worsen "every few months."

While the current House proposal would bring significant cuts, Senate Democrats are pushing a two-year extension that would continue current funding levels of about $55 billion a year.

Maryland state Sen. Christopher B. Shank, Washington Republican, said state officials need to protect their own transportation funds and hopes to minimize the effect that potential federal cuts could have on projects.
He said he would oppose raising taxes to offset such cuts, but that the state could continue current funding levels by decreasing or eliminating the use of transportation funds for non-transportation purposes and focusing more on road improvements while looking for alternative ways to fund public transit.

"Folks in my district certainly use some amount of mass transit, but they're concerned about roads," Mr. Shank said. "Asking them to pay more in this time of economic uncertainty is not even something I can contemplate supporting."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/sep/7/legislators-warned-of-likely-cuts-in-federal-trans/


  

No comments:

Post a Comment